Can either of you read and comprehend, or to really get the points that show the elements of forgery in the WH PDF should someone direct you to the Karl Denninger youtube videos?
Since when is pointing out anomalies in a document “conspiracy” land?
Or would you prefer that everyone just accept the latest version of proof of Hawaiian birth as truth without any verification?
Please explain.
I’m thinking sock accounts....just a feeling.
Pointing out anomalies in a document is not "conspiracy" land.
Pointing out anomalies in a document, floating theories in a reasoned manner of how they might have gotten there (including by conspiracy) and seeking to arrive at the truth is not "conspiracy" land.
Pointing out anomalies in a document, claiming that they represent absolute legal proof of a conspiracy, ignoring all other explanations, and claiming that people who find the non-conspiracy explanations far more reasonable are trolls - that's "conspiracy" land.
Or would you prefer that everyone just accept the latest version of proof of Hawaiian birth as truth without any verification?
I'm all in favor of verification. I'm just not in favor of continuing to push things that don't now and never will actually prove a forgery for the simple reason that they are invalid.
None of the 6 main points presented by Mr. Douglas Vogt have the power to drive Mr. Obama from his office. Now frankly, I'm not sure that doing so would have that good a result, politically speaking, for conservatives anyway. Personally, I would rather see him permanently retired, and his policies relegated to the dust bin of history, in the next election.
But if we do have actual proof of fraud, I'm still all for taking it to Congress and having him removed, if only for the sake of upholding the Constitution and the law. The problem is, none of these particular arguments are going to do it.
And the other problem is, at this point at least, these arguments seem to be pretty close to all we have.