You posted a portion of the “flattened” AP document. This was covered quite extensively in the Denninger videos.
Then you'll have absolutely no difficulty in explaining exactly why, after spending many hours producing a lower-resolution forgery PDF, somebody also spent even more hours producing a high-resolution forgery as well.
See post # 147.
Oh, and you'll also have absolutely no difficulty in explaining exactly why someone felt it was necessary to manually copy approximately 50 apparently random letters and checkboxes in the PDF file (which are to-the-pixel identical to other letters and checkboxes in the image) rather than simply scanning in a real form, or using the image of a form already scanned.
Or why the now fact that such duplication to the pixel of letters is now KNOWN AND CONFIRMED to be an artifact of scanning and optimizing documents (see my recent pings for details.)
By the way, PA Engineer, I would appreciate an apology for your baseless ad hominem attack on me.