Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken in Eastman
So we are now subsidizing other countries at 47.5 cents/gallon? And if we didn’t slap a 54 cent/gallon tariff on Brazilian ethanols we WOULD be an importer and save taxpayers money.

The subsidy is paid at the blending of gasoline. It is paid regardless of the source. If we eliminated the tariff, the subsidy would still be paid, but we would be promoting the foreign import over domestic production without the tariff.

It costs 65% more energy to produce ethanol than the energy we derive from ethanol.

That has been proved false multiple times.

I am not a fan of the subsidy. But as long as we have it, the tariff is needed so we are not subsidizing foreign production.

27 posted on 05/27/2011 4:55:58 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

“The subsidy is paid at the blending of gasoline. It is paid regardless of the source. If we eliminated the tariff, the subsidy would still be paid, but we would be promoting the foreign import over domestic production without the tariff.”

You appear to be forgetting about these subsidies.

http://farm.ewg.org/progdetail.php?fips=00000&progcode=corn


42 posted on 05/27/2011 7:15:53 AM PDT by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson