Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: fightinJAG

So you like blogpimps. Support blogpimps. Perhaps even know a few.

How nice for you. The excerpt button perhaps is a turn-on for you.

Do you realize you are supporting folks who USE Free Republic
as a free advertising platform for their ill-conceived and
poorly written screeds? That you endorse people who steal
traffic from out beloved Free Republic in order to enrich themselves?

Blogpimps are scum, yet you support them.

I’d really hope that you are ignorant of what blogpimps
are doing and have no idea of the reality behind what you
are supporting.

Because they suck. Each and severally. They suck HARD.

They view Free Republic as a marketing tool.

You support that? I had a higher opinion of you.

Perhaps I was wrong.


145 posted on 05/17/2011 4:08:19 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: humblegunner

“They view Free Republic as a marketing tool.”

-The- money quote.
[pun may or not be intended]


171 posted on 05/17/2011 7:28:01 PM PDT by Salamander (I'm your pain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

To: humblegunner

Get real. You know very well that I support what’s best for FR and it’s my opinion, which you happen to disagree with, that this blog overlord nonsense has reached proportions where it is both embarrasing and damaging to the site.

Of course, I don’t support any of the things you suggest. I expect you to argue better than to simply make sarcastic assumptions about what “I” support simply because I disagree with your approach to what we both agree is a problem.

All of the things you bring up can be dealt with the usual way: by getting rid of abusive posters and by freepers deciding FOR THEMSELVES not to click on stuff that is “ill-conceived,” “poorly written” or a simple “marketing piece.”

I think we can all figure out what those things look like. I certainly don’t need anyone protecting me from links I think I dumb. I know how to not click on them when I don’t want to click on them.

As for the integrity of the site and the forum experience, again, it’s simple: if a poster is abusive, let the mods zot them. In the meantime, if a poster’s threads die a natural death because they are all the things you are complaining about, good.

Could you show me, please, how this particular blogger, the OP, just to try to bring this discussion down to specifics, posted ill-conceived, poorly written, marketing tools?

If I had posted a normal thread (link and excerpt) to the OP’s blog, wouldn’t that have been okay?

You know I’m not trying to fight with you, hg. But I do disagree with this phenomenon (what it has become) and it’s a positive to hash some of this out here.


213 posted on 05/18/2011 10:03:16 AM PDT by fightinJAG (I am sick of people adding their comments to titles in the title box. Thank you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson