You hope the SCOTUS will say fruit of the poisionous tree but hope is not a strategy that you can count on.
>You hope the SCOTUS will say fruit of the poisionous tree but hope is not a strategy that you can count on.
And, if you take a look at the 4th Amendment case the USSC decided the other day — about police-created exigence being valid — it’s actually more likely that GINSBURG will be the one dissenting claiming poisoned-tree...
(Ginsburg was the only dissent in that case.)