Posted on 05/16/2011 7:24:04 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike
As I recalled this little poem the other night it set me to wondering if we in America might have a “Little Man Who Wasn’t There” in the person of a man in the Oval Office who has never shown himself to be eligible to hold that office. I saw the April 27, 2011 birth certificate posted on the White House website and wondered what it might show if it were real so I decided to find out. For starters, let’s pretend that the document posted on the WH site April 27, 2011 (hereafter WHBC) is on the up and up as the man now occupying the Oval Office pretends. Let’s also pretend that the missing birth vitals (height, weight, etc.) attested to by the physician who in fact delivered the infant are not required to show an actual birth (which of course is nonsense) and/or that any adoption or other information is of no interest - even though there is ample evidence that the individual WAS adopted in Indonesia. We’ll also ignore all of the gross and obvious signs of forgery ... we’re pretending it’s honest, ok???
What, then, does the WHBC REALLY show??? Let’s stick only to facts already known and point to definitive sources in analyzing the document. Note that we are not commenting on whether the WHBC is real or forged but merely stipulating for the purpose of this analysis that IF it is real then what does it actually tell us???1
(Excerpt) Read more at obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com ...
A couple of points. In the Wong Kim Ark case, the Supreme Court acknowledged that (at the time) parents COULD do something to cause the child to lose his or her citizenship: "... has never lost or changed that residence, or gained or acquired another residence, and neither he nor his parents acting for him ever renounced his allegiance to the United States, or did or committed any act or thing to exclude him ..." The state department has admitted on an adoption website that it cannot protect U.S. citizenship for those persons adopted in countries that do not recognize dual citizenship (such as Indonesia). Further, the issue isn't just whether Obama/ Soetoro may have lost/renounced his U.S. citizenship (if he EVER had it to begin with), but whether Obama acted as a foreign citizen as an adult and whether he took steps to dishonestly hide his foreign citizenship(s) from voters. How many people vote for a guy when they learn he's lied about whether he was ever the citizen of another country??
Why do you assune that he was born "here"?
“...his own statement that he didn’t have a US passport until 2004...”
Could you direct me to a source for this? Since O. publicly stated that he travelled to Pakistan and India in 1980, this would be a most interesting contradiction. Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.