Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: 6ft2inhighheelshoes
This sounds like it is written by one of the weak, effete, Republican Elite who is deathly afraid of the Tea Party revolution. Even Reagan new that conservatism was built upon libertarianism. And why should anyone be afraid of progressive Republicans like Johnson being included in debates? The authors connection to NRO explains a lot, they too are afraid of the peoples revolution.
2 posted on 05/08/2011 9:51:18 PM PDT by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Prokopton
>>>>>Even Reagan new that conservatism was built upon libertarianism.

Horseshit! Reagan was a conservative, not a libertarian. He gave one interview in his entire political career about Libertarianism. That was to the Libertarian Party rag, Reason magazine. That interview came the year before he ran for potus against Pres Ford. Reagan was politicking, mining for possible votes. Reagan was the master rhetorician and used similar language when it came to the Republican Party and conservative principles.

3 posted on 05/08/2011 10:01:00 PM PDT by Reagan Man ("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Prokopton
And why should anyone be afraid of progressive Republicans like Johnson being included in debates?

He can debate all he wants but what the hell is a .. "progressive republican"?

Just another RINO who wants to give ILLEGAL CRIMINALS a 'Green Card' so that they can work "Legally" in the US!

The guy's an idiot!

4 posted on 05/08/2011 10:02:05 PM PDT by freejohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Prokopton; Allegra

>>> This sounds like it is written by one of the weak, effete, Republican Elite who is deathly afraid of the Tea Party revolution.

“Deathly afraid of the Tea Party revolution.”? That’s a bad joke.

Saturday, May 10, 2008
Cindy Sheehan endorses Ron Paul over Barack Obama

http://wigdersonlibrarypub.blogspot.com/2008/05/cindy-sheehan-endorses-ron-paul-over.html

and earlier:

Sheehan: “I don’t want to even discuss who is likely to be the Republican nominee, because besides having little foreign policy difference between any of them and Hillary, anyone of them would be a complete disaster on matters of war and peace, with the possible exception of Ron Paul (Tx).”

http://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/1590/t/523/blog/comments.jsp?key=346&blog_entry_KEY=21045&t

>>> I’ve always said that Ron Paul and his ilk are more aligned with the left than they are the right.

See above, though oddly enough he appeals to the Nazis of Stormfront as well. And generally his proponents on FR spend most of their time tearing down republicans and trying to divide and disrupt.


29 posted on 05/09/2011 12:15:47 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson