Well, I guess the proof of his service is now academic.
I was going to point out that just like he rejects the written record of Scripture as fairy tale and superstition, we would be well within our rights to reject any documents of his service record as nothing but a fabrication. If it were a *fact* is ought to be able to be *proved* scientifically. Now we’ll never have the opportunity to find out otherwise.
The the point is moot now.
But that didn't stop your post about a moot point to someone who cannot respond.