[AndrewC]

My point is that 1 Peter is talking of utterances, not Jesus, and the English translations (except those totally doctirnally tainited, such as some fundie BA version such as 21KJV) use the lower case "w" in for the word (utterance)

No the discussion is about "reborn"(born again/above) and the assertion that this is the antecendant to the conclusion that John is a liar. I stated that your deconstruction(disarticulation) attempt had no bearing since this was about a mistranslation into Greek. I again stated that despite whatever the source was, Paul was talking about a rebirth since he mentioned seed.

So, you are saying all of these are wrong...yet the Bible is inerrant. Brilliant/s.

Saying "NO" again would fall on deaf ears as the written word falls on blind eyes.

[kosta50]

No the discussion is about "reborn"(born again/above) and the assertion that this is the antecendant to the conclusion that John is a liar. I stated that your deconstruction(disarticulation) attempt had no bearing since this was about a mistranslation into Greek

Again, how could mistranslation occur when John was writing under "inspiration"? The fact is that John 3:3-4 cannot be retrotranslated into Aramaic and make any sense. Thus, either John mistranslated under "inspiration" or he made it up.