Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Diamond; count-your-change
Assuming that he was not based on nothing more than the absence of an explicit claim to the contrary amounts to an argument from silence

So is assuming that he was.

3,412 posted on 06/16/2011 10:25:21 AM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3404 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50; count-your-change
So is assuming that he was.

Not an unreasonable supposition, assuming that Jesus existed, and had disciples who were with in him for a period of several years.

But I'm not the one making a claim that the whole conversation was just made up, and whoever wrote it wasn't even there. You are not being agnostic enough on this point. How could you possibly be in a position to know such a thing?

Cordially,

3,433 posted on 06/16/2011 3:22:47 PM PDT by Diamond (He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3412 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson