[boatbums]

Which is why extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. When the evidence is not produced with the PRESUMPTION that such evidence will be rejected before it is allowed to be examined, the entire train of logic is derailed.

Ok, tell us what would constitute "proof" in your eyes? All you have done so far, whenever attempts have been made to do that, is shoot them down with your very own presumptions rather than genuine examination of the evidence. So what would be suitable evidence in your view? Give a target that stays in one place long enough to hit.

[Godzilla]

So what would be suitable evidence in your view?

Jesus could appear to them and they wouldn't believe him unless he supplied his long form birth certificate