Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: LeGrande
. "Ok someone out of the clan of Bethlehem Ephratah, shall rule Israel.

< And misquoting the verse doesn't gain you points either lg. There is nothing in the passage that refers even to a 'clan'. Even a wussy atheist like yourself should be able to see that those words do not appear in the text.

Tis a good thing you are not a bible scholar lg - you'd be on 0bama welfare.

So in regards to lying - inserting 'clan' into the text where it doesn't exist. But why should you care - you have no God to be accountable too. And for accusing me of lying what is the evidence? There is no evidence of a clan being cited - evidence points to geography lg -

Bethlehem Ephratah, to distinguish it from another Beth-lehem, which was in the tribe of Zebulun, Jos 19:15.

Geography, not clan

I'm not lying - you are.

2,768 posted on 06/10/2011 10:23:28 PM PDT by Godzilla (3-7-77)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2742 | View Replies ]


To: Godzilla
My statement wasn't a quote. I clearly inserted Clan to clarify the meaning of the scripture and separately correctly quoted the scripture.

You on the other hand stated that I didn't know what a "Tribe" was.

Obviously you were lying when you implied that I said "Tribe" not clan.

There is no evidence of a clan being cited - evidence points to geography lg -

No the evidence "Bethlehem Ephratah" clearly points to lineage. And of course if you put the scripture in context it has nothing to do with Christ.

2,821 posted on 06/11/2011 5:33:13 AM PDT by LeGrande ("life's tough; it's tougher if you're stupid." John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2768 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson