Boatbums, if you bring out a Muslim to comment about why his deity is true, or if you bring out a Hindu to do the same, I would be more than willing to attack their assumptions. We don’t have any that do here, and hence, my focus is primarily on the assumptions of those who I am commenting with - which, to no surprise, should be obvious what that demographic comprises of.
I have attacked Islam as frequently as I can - it will only take you to look at my posting history to find out. To claim without basis that I don’t, in the face of produced evidence even on this very thread, is to bear false witness, and to lie.
When I bring about the paradoxical problems of time and deity and their interplay, I am attacking the foundational assumptions of all these religions, as well.
Now you want the facts to get in the way of their mutual trust?
My point was more towards the renown atheists - people like Hitchens and Dawkins. Have they made it a practice to conduct formal debates with prominent Muslims? How about Buddhists or Hindis? Have any of them written books criticizing polytheistic religions like they have the monotheistic Christian faith? I don't believe I have ever heard or seen them do so, so it does bring up the question of why, don't you think?