You are correct, MM. James’ view is an assumption that’s based on whatever social convention is currently in fashion.
My view is actually not an assumption. It is the analysis of a reading. One can reject the book from which I read it, but one can’t say that I made it up, simply assumed it.
You've completely failed to comprehend my replies to you in this regard. Neither have you addressed them. No amount of mutual back-scratching can substitute for reason. Please try again.