Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: James C. Bennett
If they cannot objectively substantiate their claims, they’ll run an insult tirade why those who reject their dogma are bad, are crazy, are nuts, and so on

They "substantiate" their claims by this silly circular reasoning: they believe because the Bible says so, and they believe the Bible is true, so therefore it must be true. Solipsism. Unadulterated infantile egotism. They believe it, ergo it MUST be true.

2,176 posted on 06/07/2011 4:05:59 PM PDT by kosta50
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2166 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50

LOL, now it’s typos under attack. Nothing of substance to contribute, as expected. One would assume that it wouldn’t take much in terms of intelligence to understand the message in spite of accidentally misplaced letters (mistakes they never make because they’re perfect and sane, LOL!), but no, they just trip over them and run in circles around their circular “logic” arguments. Think about the cognitive dissonance at play here: They can identify the intended spelling, but prefer to make fantastic linkages between unintended typos and the lack of mental acumen, deliberately choosing to skip what they KNOW is the intended message.

Such a bore!


2,187 posted on 06/07/2011 6:31:51 PM PDT by James C. Bennett (An Australian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2176 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson