Replies

In my experience, copies taken from rolls of microfilm are flat not curved. The film is placed between two pieces of glass and projected on a screen/viewer so the image can be sized by moving the lens, focused by turning a lever which adjusts focus, and also aligned up and down and right and left in the center of the viewing screen and then a copy can be made.

I believe the rounding would have to be from the original filming of the document (possibly in a book) not from using the roll of microfilm. Either that or from making a current copy without taking the book apart. (why not?) I would like to know how the books of BC are “bound” usually they would have removable pages held together between front and back covers with binding posts and screws...in other words they individual pages could be seperated from the “book” to be copied. Did Hawaii cut corners on this part of the original microfilming? Did they do it this way to give the impression to the public that the “bound” books cannot have pages removed? If that is so, show us a picture of the book and tell us when the book was permanently bound. Hawaii should have videotaped the whole process from locating the book (in a vault?) to locating the document and showing exactly how they copied it. EPIC FAIL

It amazes me this document has a hand stamp showing it to be a true copy or abstract when by all rights Hawii should have had Dr. Onaka hand sign the document as certified..did they use the hand stamp because it allows for the two options, 1) true copy or 2) abstract and that and signing by hand would have to choose one or the other?

Hawaii still sucks on this issue and has not unmuddied the waters and all Obama has done is thrown fuel on the fire by presenting this document to the public.

The incompetence and/or corruption of our governments scares the heck out of me..Imagine if their is a real document could they have done a worse job of presenting it to the public if they tried?