Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Tzimisce

In a just world the media would have focused on the intent of the term used “Natural Born Citizen” (as distinct from the more common “native born citizen” ) the intent was to assure the person elected to the most powerful office would manifest
allegiance to no other sovereignty.The 0 has NEVER produced such.Can a man raised by a Muslim turned atheist, and Communist slut of an atheistic mam. And by another Muslim named Soetoro in Indonesia.The only constant seeming the atheistic Communist mentor.Can a man who has manifest his contempt for America and our Constitution who believes all things are equal (and he more equal than any other) prove allegiance to no other sovereign than these United States of America?don’t mean nothin!


6 posted on 04/28/2011 4:22:39 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: StonyBurk

I sense much anger in you.


7 posted on 04/28/2011 4:56:03 AM PDT by freepguy (Man never does evil more completely or more cheerfully as when he does it with religious conviction.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: StonyBurk

The founders did not want someone with divided loyalty being President of the US.

This is why they very carefully stated who could be President.

Arnold Schwarzenegger could never be President of the US - he’s a citizen, but not a natural born citizen.


9 posted on 04/28/2011 12:15:00 PM PDT by Tzimisce (Never forget that the American Revolution began when the British tried to disarm the colonists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson