Yes, it tells you that the released PDF is a digitally created and manipulated document.
In 1961, Stanley Ann Dunham did not sign a piece of paper with a green 21st Century digital background on it.
That's a cold, hard fact.
I am not saying whether the information on this is genuine or not. What I am saying is that this is obviously a computer generated image that has been manipulated to at least layer the alleged original writing over the 21st Century digital background ..... colored green, no less.
Once you manipulate a digital image, it's manipulated and nobody can claim to know what else may have been manipulated .... or not manipulated.
I have been involved in genealogy reserch for years and I have a friend in Spain that works in the Spanish church and state archives. When he finds a birth documentation of one of my ancestors, he sends the documentation to me.
You know how he does that?
Simple. He takes his digital camera, takes a digital photo of the original 19th Century or 18th Century or 17th Century document and then he e-mails the digital photo to me.
The digital images get to me showing paper tears, water stains, ink smudges, etc.,etc.
Nowhere in the process is Photoshop involved.
Do you know how many of those digital photos of the original documents showed 18th Century alleged writing on a 21st Century digital background?
None of them. Zero. Nada. Zip. Zilch.
The document released by the White House is a digitally manipulated image and not a digital photo of an original document. Figuring that out is not Rocket Science.
Just release a true, unmanipulated image of the original document: That is all Obama has to do.
The digital photo above, water stains and all, sent to me by my friend in Spain, is of a genuine 1761 birth documentation dated 15 December 1761:
"En el quince dia del mes de Diciembre de mil seteciento sesenta y uno ....."
If I can easily provide a true digital image of a genuine birth documentation, without resorting to Photoshop, of a Spaniard that was born in 1761, why on Earth does the President of the United States refuse to release a similar image of his own birth documentation for 1961?
There are two very simple questions:
1.) Why won't President Obama simply end this circus by releasing an unmanipulated image of the original long-form document?
2.) "What is President Obama hiding and why is he hiding it?"