[LearsFool]

Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution.

Gaps? What gaps? There are no gaps.

A candidate for President must meet one of two citizenship criteria: either (A) a natural born citizen, or (B) a citizen at the time of the adoption of the Constitution.

Those who see no difference between "a citizen" and "a natural born citizen" will have to explain what they must claim is a redundancy in Article 2 Section 1.

Cite the criteria for citizenship all you like. It has zero bearing on the question at hand.

[fruser1]

The gap is that it did not specifically define what “natural born citizen” actually is.

[PieterCasparzen]

To LearsFool...

Precisely... I like how this “natural born” thread has a few posts and the birth certificate has hundreds.

The SCOTUS is completely aware of this and knows that the 4 conservatives would lose any shred of any semblance of being strict Constitutionalists if they did not offer correct opinions on this. If they did offer correct opinions, the fact that Congress is aware of this eligibility problem will be made public. So I sincerely doubt they will agree to hear this case until long after nobama is out of office.

Congress is completely aware, media heads are completely aware. The “powers that be” are aware. So the nation hangs by a thread while the “natural born” requirement which makes nobama Constitutionally ineligible is - quite amazingly - kept completely out of all mainstream media.

It’s amazing that it already is “out”. Probably 15% of the population is completely aware of the coverup which is taking place in broad daylight.

Your post sums the issue up in very few words which most everyone could understand.

Simply amazing.