e continued, “My belief is that there is a birth certificate, he was born here, but that there is information that for reasons known only to him he doesn’t want released. If it were just the birth certificate, that would be one thing, but it’s his school records, it’s employment records. … Why would anybody, let alone the president of the United States, spend millions of dollars in legal fees to keep that hidden?” This said by Sen. Slom.
Perhaps if Obama had to spend his own money instead of campaign or taxpayer supported lawyers, he just might cough up the information. If he is using taxpayer (federally paid attorneys) or attorneys paid by campaign funds, he should at least be required to include the cost as taxable income. He is benefiting from the free legal service.
Hell, my employer used to provide me a parking space in a parking garage near the office, and I had to include the cost of the parking space as taxable income. So why shouldn’t he. The feds need all the taxable income that they can find. Start with Obama.
You do know about his taxes on his Chicago house, don't you? There are three people listed as owners but he and Moochelle aren't any of them. There's a woman living in the guest house who supposedly owns the guest house. The other two are his attorney and some corporation (the O's might be that) which is acting as a hedge. The other owners are paying the mortgage but he deducted it on his income tax and he also claimed the property tax deduction. Throw in the monkey business with the Tony Rezko with the sale of the house itself and later with the adjacent property and it's Chicago at it's finest. It's good to be king, huh.