Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
It thus clearly appears that, by the law of England for the last three centuries

Yes, English law not U.S. Law. For clarity you can look at the case of U.S. President Chester Alan Arthur.

What is the source and circumstances of the quote you referenced?

124 posted on 04/24/2011 6:55:01 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Fossil
The quote was from the decision in the Wong Kim Ark case. Sorry I didn't post the link. Meant to.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0169_0649_ZO.html

English law not U.S. Law.

Nope.

"III. The same rule was in force ... in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the Constitution..."

As I said, if you don't like it, go argue with the Court. I consider a Court ruling a good deal more authoritative than special pleading by cherry picking ancient authors.

I am unaware of any legal decision involving Arthur's situation. Claims were made he wasn't NBC. But it appears the claims never got any traction. Nobody cared.

131 posted on 04/24/2011 7:11:07 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson