If private investigators got access to patient data (which I would not expect to be computerized in 1961) then the hospitals involved are in for a big fine for failure to protect patient data. Most hospitals use off site secure storage, and someone would have to get in and sift through boxes of records - many, many hours or days of work without knowing which box held which record.
Second, you’re saying that if there were genuine evidence that Obama’s mother was on record as having been a patient in any Honolulu hospital, amid all this storm and controversy, that said hospital would not step forward to claim ( with the grateful permission of ze Fraudster himself) the distinction of “birthplace” of the Potus?
If the Fraudster gave his permission, they could do it. But absent that permission, it's a HIPAA violation, with a whopping big fine and prison time. I've worked in several hospitals, and no hospital I'm familiar with would risk it. And as I've linked in the past, Kapiolani specifically said
"We can't confirm or deny it — even though all the information out there says he was born at Kapiolani Hospital. And that's because of the HIPA law."
“If private investigators got access to patient data (which I would not expect to be computerized in 1961) then the hospitals involved are in for a big fine for failure to protect patient data.”
Are you seriously just now tumbling to the fact that multiple parties are accessories to this far reaching, gargantuan charade and could be in for a “big fine” as you quaintly put it (try 30 years in the pen).
And whatever reason on God’s green earth would Obama have for blocking the release of his mother’s admission and subsequent delivery of him at any Honolulu hospital?