Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. 'birther' bill's odds improve, analyst says
The Pittsburgh Tribune-Review ^ | April 20, 2011 | Brad Bumsted

Posted on 04/21/2011 8:58:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

HARRISBURG -- State legislation requiring presidential candidates to prove they are natural-born citizens is a political effort aimed at President Obama, a Philadelphia Democrat said today.

Rep. Babette Josephs, ranking Democrat on the House State Government Committee, said the bill by Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry, the committee chairman, isn't needed since Obama says he is an American citizen and has produced documentation.

"I believe him myself," said Josephs, who as the chair last session blocked the bill from being considered.

Metcalfe has 28 co-sponsors for the bill he said was initiated "in light of the controversy regarding citizenship and public officials."

"I wouldn't say (the bill) is specifically in response to Obama," Metcalfe said Tuesday. The bill stems from the lack of documentation required for candidates, he said.

"Despite his (Metcalfe's disclaimers), it seems to me it is aimed at President Obama and his re-election effort," Josephs said. "I think it is very political in a negative sense."

Metcalfe's memo seeking co-sponsorship says presidential and vice presidential candidates would have to establish proof of "natural born citizenship," age and residency....

(Excerpt) Read more at pittsburghlive.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Local News; Politics
KEYWORDS: allegedlyamerican; allegedlyeligible; allegedlyhawaiian; birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"I believe him myself," said Josephs

Why the heck do you, Josephs, play the political fool by saying you believe a man who is widely known to be a incessant liar? That's not common sense. It's pure suckupism.

21 posted on 04/22/2011 5:50:41 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
-- if they do, they will be challenged in court (although I can't imagine what grounds they will use). --

They could be challenged by a birther, on the grounds that the criteria established by law are incorrect, as a matter of law. Specifically, if the statute dos not require an inquiry in the citizenship of the parents, then the statute is lacking.

The suit would not be one of sufficiency of evidence, it would be a pure question of law.

There are arguments on the other side, about the principle of separation of powers, where it is up to Congress, and Congress alone to render a decision as to presidential qualification.

22 posted on 04/22/2011 5:51:06 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm contacting my house rep, David Maloney, and asking him to support the bill.
23 posted on 04/22/2011 6:25:10 AM PDT by floozy22 (The left has an irrational devotion to protecting evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson