[BallandPowder]

Powder..patch..ball FIRE!

I don’t think it will matter who runs against the current administration.

They are going to come up with some reason to suspend elections, declare martial law and then do whatever they want until we the people stop them.

[DonaldC]

I don’t think he is sufficiently blamed for the country’s ills to just write him off.

[ex-Texan]

Take a peek at this report:

Supreme Court Justices Admit Obama Eligibility Is a Problem !

NWO traitors and corrupt bastards are applying pressure everywhere . . .

[Argus]

Without the major media running constant interference for Obama he might be vulnerable. But they will circle the wagons around their messiah and direct all their fire at whoever his opponent is, and I feel great anxiety as to the outcome.

[flat]

'......just think what George Bush would’ve done with Obama’s Marxist background and politically radioactive associations with Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright and Tony Rezko - I can’t imagine anyone losing to the most vulnerable reelection candidate in American history.....'

YEP what a quiver full of arrows pappy mac possessed, eh? BUT...incredulously, deigned not to use any of them....nary a one; SARAH, she wanted to, but was told NOT to....aint that the biggest WTF you ever heard of? ....so the republicans might have won had SARAH run the show HER WAY.....otoh this time out SARAH is unencumbered by the clueless....bad news for the dems, eh?

What we need is gravitas.....

→ → → → → → → ALASKAN GRAVITAS

[Names Ash Housewares]

A fiscal conservative with some passion, a bit of charisma and ability to educate about it is probably all it takes!

Obama is not a god that hurls thunderbolts.

He is not half the hype he used to be and that hope and change is getting stinky as hell.

[bobjam]

“Unless his opponent throws in the towel like McCain did in 2008”

Which is why the GOP will likely nominate someone who does throw in the towel.

[Polybius]

I don’t think it much matters who runs against Obama in 2012. ..... - I can’t imagine anyone losing to the most vulnerable reelection candidate in American history. ...... FredDardick

I can.

All it takes is for the GOP to be irrational enough to nominate a candidate that 72% of all voters do NOT believe would be a good President.

FOX News Poll (February 7-9, 2011)

Question 3: I am going to read you a list of names. Tell me if you think that person would make a good President or not.

Sarah Palin:

.................YES.........NO.......DK.....Never heard of

ALL...........23%.......72%.........4%.......1%

Dem ...........7%........87%........5%.......1%

Rep ...........40%.......56%.......3%.......1%

Ind ...........25%........69%.......3%.......1%

Are you not old enough to remember that even Jimmy Carter "whipped Ted Kennedy's ass" in the primaries in 1980?

When Jimmy Carter told a group of Congressmen at a White House dinner last week that if Senator Edward Kennedy runs against him in 1980, "I'll whip his ass," most major news organizations hastened to quote the remark in living off-color.

In the 20 April Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll, fifty-three percent (53%) of the voters disapproved of Obama

A candidate with a negative polling of 53% gets reelected by running against a candidate with a negative polling of 72%.

It's not Rocket Science.

just think what George Bush would’ve done with Obama’s Marxist background and politically radioactive associations with Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright and Tony Rezko

George W. Bush would have done exactly what he did with this photo.

Absolutely nothing.

[shalom aleichem]

Well he should, and he deserves to lose (and tried for treason) BUT who will beat him? Need an opponent to beat him.

[CORedneck]

I think a good ad against Zero would be his “accomplishments” such as higher energy cost, weak dollar, reinstatement of Carter style inflation. Basically list one by one the misery that came in under his watch.