Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: re_nortex
What's noteworthy about kevinaw2 is that the post is intentionally inflammatory and there's no followup in the ensuing discussion. In fact all 6 posts since Kevin joined follow this hit and run pattern.

True. Add to that the core of his argument is one of the lamest anti-birther straw man arguments and brings nothing new to the issue.

He's a blogpimp, an anti-birther and a disruptor type troll.

172 posted on 04/12/2011 4:26:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye
Just the mere possibility that Obama can produce a valid birth certificate substantiating that he meets the Constitutional qualifications scares the daylights out of some people.

So what if he does? ... How would that negatively reflect on anyone who has questioned what was not provided despite years of inquiries? In other words, it's a legitimate and important question that has not been truthfully answered.

I don't see this as a result of some nefarious conspiracy ... but rather one of judges, politicians and other people with the credibility and power to investigate not having the courage to be the one to call into question the legitimacy of the first [fill in the blank] president into question that could result in the application of constitutional justice.

180 posted on 04/12/2011 4:41:16 PM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson