“...why did Obama feel compelled to state that his birth status was governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948 rather than citing the United States Constitution & the 14th Amendment?”
Because the British Nationality Act of 1948 doesn't recognize illegitimately children of British subjects as eligible for British citizenship. Only the citizenship of the mother would apply in that case.
So, for Obama to be a British subject his parents would have to have been legally married. There doesn't appear to be any evidence that they were married, just the divorce.
But I have to tell you, I really don't think it matters. The secret lies in Indonesia.
When Stanley Ann Soetoro renewed her U.S. passport in 1965, she listed her son as ‘Soebarkha (Soetoro)’, then lined the name out. Why? Because he had been adopted by her husband, Lolo, and was now legally, in Indonesia, his dependent and not hers. Soebarkha “Barry” Soetoro had to have had his own passport otherwise he wouldn't have been able to travel so frequently between Indonesia, Hawaii, and even Australia.
That is why when Stanley Ann dumped him on her parents in Hawaii, 1971, he was considered Indonesian. This explains the 999-xx-xxxx SSN he used at Occidental College. It also explains how he was able to travel to Pakistan - he had an Indonesian passport.
Senator Obama said that until he was in the U.S. Congress he had never had a passport. I believe he was telling the truth - he had never until then had a U.S. passport BECAUSE he isn't a U.S. citizen.
In July 2007 the Democratic Party sent a representative to Indonesia to buy up all records and photographs of Barak Obama and the Soetoro family. The amount of money spread around was about $150,000 - $200,000. No one would do this if Obama had just been a 10 year old American kid living with his mom and stepdad in a foreign land; this would be done only if there was a secret dangerous to the Democratic Party's future plans.
you can’t have a legal divorce in the same state as you were married unless there was verifiable documentation that it existed, so stop with the conspiracies. Donofrio has the index record of the marriage. It was indavertantly attached to the request for Obama’s vital records. Period.
for all of you to make all your conspiracies true, obama’s life and that of his parents would have to have been concocked well before the child was born and every picture & document since then would have to be fake. Period.
Now that is one big conspiracy that I’m not willing to join.
Get the facts straight, it was SADOS's 1967 passport renewel that show's jr's name as Soebarkah, not 1965. No one has been able to get anything earlier than 1967 thus far.
This explains the 999-xx-xxxx SSN he used at Occidental College
This has yet to be proven, therefore it remains yet another concocked conspiracy because of the hidden vital records documents as well as the Occidental records.
The rest of what you said is also just hearsay & conspiracy. Last I heard, hearsay is still not admissable as evidence.
He could have traveled to Pakistan on a U.S. passport too. We just don't know what he used.