Soften it by the passage of time if you wish. The undeniable truth is...it's part of Trump's background. It warrants scrutiny... just as RomneyCare dogs Mitt Romney and Bill Ayers was part of 0bama's life.
We're just going to have agree to disagree on this. You're obviously a fan of Trump's and I'm not. Under no circumstances will Donald Trump ever get my vote.
Who in the world said anything at all about not checking into or vetting Mr. Trump? I certainly didn't. But until he becomes an official candidate - which he is not - there is no great and compelling reason to perform this necessary task....unless you would prefer that we all treat Mr. Trump in the same manner that SP was treated???
I might also mention that while Romney-care dogs Romney almost to his ruin, the fact that the stain is intimately connected with the bomb-thrower Ayres makes no difference whatsoever. The stain is in office....and was never EVER vetted as he should have been. I don't believe any rightwing candidate (or private citizen that you don't care for) will ever enjoy such a "free pass". Perhaps if we'd have used your methods, the stain would not be illegally in the "white house"??
We're just going to have agree to disagree on this. You're obviously a fan of Trump's and I'm not. Under no circumstances will Donald Trump ever get my vote.
Who in the world said I was a fan of Mr. Trump? I'm simply ascerting that he has every right - as a private citizen - to make his views known and to critique severely the issues surrounding the stain and his foreign birth (until proven otherwise).
In the event Mr. Trump wins the nomination, I'd vote for him in a second over either 1) voting for the stain, or 2) not voting at all.
In a second.