Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why wasn’t Obama ever vetted?
Examiner.com ^ | Aptil 10, 2011 | Gil Guignat

Posted on 04/11/2011 10:22:56 AM PDT by GilGil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: GilGil
Why wasn’t Obama ever vetted?

The fix was in. Barry Soetoro,aka Barrack Hussein Obama, was the Globalist Banksters boy so the DNC, the RNC, the Bu$hes, the Clintons, and McLame dutifully looked the other way.

Pictured: Globalist pitchmen welcome newest member to the club.

Pictured: The Wendell Willkie of the 21st Century, taking one for the team.

61 posted on 04/11/2011 12:41:06 PM PDT by Roninf5-1 (If ignorance is bliss why are so many Americans on anti-depressants?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texmexis best
I think that there are a great number of people who know the truth but who refuse to talk.

Or are afraid to.

62 posted on 04/11/2011 12:42:45 PM PDT by Cowman (How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: texson66

Fraud and conspiracy was committed by every congressman who signed SR 511, which said McCain was eligible AND “Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and WERE UNDERSTOOD TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT..” That was a lie. It was an attempt to make Obama eligible by circumventing the Constitution and they all knew it. Sen. Claire McCaskill, Obama, Hillary, Coburn, Leahy, etc. on the Senate Judiciary Committee were determined to make McCain and Obama their candidates.

Hillary did not expose Obama because she already had enough delegates, besides Obama was a fellow Marxist. She and McCain got screwed when Howard Dean forced Hillary’s delegates to switch votes at the convention. BTW the Bushes are globalists like Soros and Obama. They think they will be among the elite. Congress would impeach themselves if they try to impeach Obama.


63 posted on 04/11/2011 12:51:23 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Why wasn’t Obama vetted?

Because three years ago people like Donald Trump, and most voters in general, were getting their news from CNN instead of FreeRepublic.


64 posted on 04/11/2011 12:57:04 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Sarah Palin is above taking the fake high road.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balata

“Ted Kennedy effectively passed John Kennedy’s torch to Obama to carry the liberal cause when he gave his famous support speech.”

He also passed along the Kennedy legacy of corruption: the same “ends-justifies-the-means” mentality that underlay the tricks and graft used to elect JFK (including having the mob “deliver” the vote in Chicago) were quite visible in the appalling tactics Obama thugs used to steal delegate votes through the caucus process, the laundering of illegal foreign contributions through “small donors” and the blatant thuggery visible in the New Black Panther Party’s voter intimation tactics. It was almost as if the city that had handed JFK the election in 1960 were being rewarded with the chance to elect “one of its own” a half century later.


65 posted on 04/11/2011 1:04:56 PM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

Don’t forget, Sen. Tom Coburn (R-OK), Leahy, McCaskill (who wrote it), Obama, Clinton, and Webb sponsored SR 511 which received from Congress a near unanimous vote saying McCain was eligible, and for Obama the resolution stated, “Whereas previous presidential candidates were born outside of the United States of America and were UNDERSTOOD TO BE ELIGIBLE to be President; and” April 30, 2008. THAT WAS A LIE. At the Dem Convention, McCain and Hillary got screwed when Howard Dean forced Hillary’s delegates to vote for Obama.

They all violated the Constitution in order to get their own man nominated. They are all guilty. Congress cannot impeach Obama because they would be forced to testify against themselves. They have no integrity. They would rather America collapse than admit what they did. They will not even discuss ineligibility. That is why the Tea Party said to vote them all out. They betrayed the USA.


66 posted on 04/11/2011 1:14:14 PM PDT by charlie72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: john mirse

“Just wondering: I wonder what passport Obama used to travel to Africa as a young man in that photo where he is wearing a Muslim outfit.”

That picture was taken when he traveled to Kenya in 2006. He most likely held a US Passport at that time. I’ve heard somewhere that Congressmen and Senators are issued special passports, but I can’t seem to find any information on that now.


67 posted on 04/11/2011 1:37:02 PM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Liz; ASA Vet; LonePalm
You all may somewhat recall what the vetting process for anyone in the military for those needing TS or TS CW clearances, it was extensive involving the FBI, NIS (or CID) and even the IRS, sifting through everything from previous addresses, traffic violations (petty misdemeanors), criminal records (and associations), school records, tax records and probably dental records too.

A lot of politicians who were or are veterans got the same and it became part of their public record.....with the exception of John Kerry, whose DD214 and record of military service was also kept hidden from view (although his associations after his military service (and possibly his summary dismissal) were well documented and published at the time of the VN War demonstrations and revived during his run for the POTUS. That was luck and the SWBVets that the exposure was possible.

The recent crop of liberals after McGovern and Kerry have no such records to examine....and Surprise! Surprise!, the democrats have matriculated a winning ticket candidate into their party that has no apparently verifiable records at all.

Most elite liberals are not able to be thoroughly vetted because of their drug use, different sexual norms for them and the lack an inner morality code.

I don't think they have to be 'elite', just connected.
68 posted on 04/11/2011 2:53:09 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK; Grampa Dave
Grampa Dave insightfully posted: "Most elite liberals are not able to be thoroughly vetted because of their drug use, different sexual norms for them and the lack an inner morality code." -----I don't think they have to be 'elite', just connected.

That's a definition of "elite"---being connected.

69 posted on 04/11/2011 3:01:26 PM PDT by Liz (A taxpayer voting for Obama is like a chicken voting for Col Sanders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Grampa Dave

Well he’s not a Kennedy or a Daley but the connections are there. So you’re right; pathemata mathemata. Thanks for the tune up, Liz.


70 posted on 04/11/2011 3:10:41 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhaul Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: charlie72
Congress cannot impeach Obama because they would be forced to testify against themselves

Don't need to impeach him . . . he was never president . . . couldn't be . . . Constitution prohibits aliens from that position . . . can't impeach what wasn't legally inaugurated . . . All he needs to be is REMOVED!

I'll be glad to help!

71 posted on 04/11/2011 3:18:49 PM PDT by laweeks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: kathsua
Does anyone know how the media treated rumors of John Kennedy’s Addison’s disease in 1960? I read somewhere that it was mentioned but JFK wouldn’t release his medical records so people could tell for sure. The result was voters elected a man who could have died at any time. His condition wasn’t confirmed until long after his death.

Actually, Kennedy's people and the doctors flat-out lied:

John F. Kennedy has not, nor has he ever, had an ailment described classically as Addison's disease, which is tuberculous destruction of the adrenal gland. Any statement to the contrary is malicious and false. ... In the post-war period he had some mild adrenal insufficiency and this is not in any way a dangerous condition. And it is possible that even this might be corrected over the years since ACTH stimulation tests for adrenal function was [sic] considered normal in 1958. Doctors have stated that this condition might have arisen out of his wartime experiences of shock and malaria.

Lyndon Johnson's people knew about Kennedy and Addison's and spread the rumor to the media.

Kennedy was actually one of the (anonymous, unnamed) case histories in an article on Addison's in the Journal of the American Medical Asociation. But when the campaign and the doctors issued a flat denial, the digging stopped.

Even now, when a candidate "releases his medical records" it's not necessarily the doctor's notes and prescription records that are released. Probably it's more like a summary of basic information.

72 posted on 04/11/2011 3:23:21 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

Excellent point.


73 posted on 04/11/2011 5:18:38 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: laweeks

I know. The radio people are too fat and happy


74 posted on 04/11/2011 5:20:18 PM PDT by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
"Could it possibly be that this Birther crap is simply pure stupidity and is only pursued by people unable to think clearly because they are either blinded by emotion or are pursuing an agenda? "
 
Initially, I thought there wasn't much to this issue (I had only given it superficial consideration)... then, I decided to try to look into it with an open mind, and find out everything I could about it from any source I could find.  So, I did.
 
Now, I firmly believe that anyone who looks into all the details and thinks that Obama established his eligibility to run for POTUS is either ignorant of the pertinent facts or is pursuing an agenda. 
 
Note that I'm not saying Obama is categorically ineligible, just that he never provided adequate documentation to establish his eligibility under the provisions of the Constitution. 

75 posted on 04/11/2011 5:52:25 PM PDT by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Please, please send these to Donald Trump’s office, to his attorney and to any other contacts you or any of the Freepers can provide who can bring this to Donald’s attention.


76 posted on 04/11/2011 8:27:37 PM PDT by active citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Let_It_Be_So

Ay, there’s the rub.

Nope, Obama hasn’t established his eligibility.

But... No President ever has (at least to my knowledge).

There is no established legal requirement or process that specifies how a candidate should demonstrate eligibility and to whom proof should be shown. This is a major hole in the process, IMHO. And one that needs serious correction.

That said, I’d ask you to consider whether the efforts to get states to pass the necessary legislation are helped or hindered by attention whores like Orly Taitz or retarded theories which claim that Obama’s name is really “Steve”.


77 posted on 04/11/2011 10:37:42 PM PDT by El Sordo (The bigger the government, the smaller the citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: wideminded

Truman would have. Ya ever wonder why FDR dumped Wallace?


78 posted on 04/12/2011 7:56:50 AM PDT by US Navy Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo
That said, I’d ask you to consider whether the efforts to get states to pass the necessary legislation are helped or hindered by ....or retarded theories which claim that Obama’s name is really “Steve”.
 
I've considered it before and believe those are unhelpful distractions that take away from the serious discussions, at best.

79 posted on 04/12/2011 8:44:35 AM PDT by Let_It_Be_So
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Republic

Impeach her?. Shed be lucky. One reason why she didn’t retire was to avoid prosecution by being a congressperson. She belongs behind bars for what she did.


80 posted on 04/12/2011 8:57:48 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson