That is not true. I have categorically rejected the Obama family sage relating to the year beginning August 1961!
Remember that SADO’s year in WA with baby Barry invalidates the “Dreams” narrative of the newly married couple and destroys the Obama family myth, Barry's credibility and that of Abercrombie as well.
When evaluating this investigation, I have always advocated that each piece of claimed evidence must be examined on its own merits and either accepted or rejected on that basis. Documents that can be subsequently validated as to provenance have the highest credibility.
“That is not true. I have categorically rejected the Obama family sage relating to the year beginning August 1961!”
Good.
The problem with your approach, though, is that it is too limiting. I think evaluating each document or each photo or each quote, etc. is necessary but if you do nothing but that, if you stop there you are going to limit your chance of finding the truth. I don’t think it is a bad idea to come up with a theory, float it and see how it would account for the discrepancies in the official tale.
Hey, I still have one theory on my list about Ann that will really get me a hammering from you:
Stanley A. Dunham is grandpa’s name and SAD’s name, right? Well, what if Stanley A. Dunham wasn’t the SAD we know her to be and was really Stanley Armour Dunahm Jr. and grandpa actually did get the son always wanted? The son could have died prior to Zero running for office and his handlers retro-fit SAD into the name when they were looking for a mother for the story. Why would I think that one up? I found it hard to believe that any mother would allow her daughter to be named “Stanley”.
Let us see the documents you have in your possession.