Aside from the issue of the Colb, there are a number of examples. The letter from the U of HI - the author ASSUMES that the student who enrolled in Fall 1960, is the same person as Stanley Ann Dunham.
There has been no transcript. The U of WA transcripts were apparently supplied, with a covering note, AS A SCAN SENT BY E-MAIL. (Or a FAX)
There is no provenance.
A later communication corrects a 'misunderstanding' about the date of commencement. The original report had the date as August 19, 1961. The explanation was that this was transcribed incorrectly and should have been SEPTEMBER 19. How-ever, the semester commenced September 25, according to the U of WA calendar from 1961. Small difference? Why can't they get ANYTHING right?
The U of WA transcripts include Mercer Island High School graduation in 1960. Funny that.
Aside from some very suspicious images in which Stanley Ann Dunham appears to have been inserted, there's nothing. - NOT A SINGLE YEAR BOOK.
None of her 'classmates' can find their yearbooks, and when asked, someone at Mercer Island High School said -
We had SIX yearbooks until recently, BUT THEY WERE STOLEN.
. . . . "SIX yearbooks until recently, BUT THEY WERE STOLEN." - !
YEP. Our team of researcher-sleuths never leave a stone unturned, and that's what we were told.
Stolen year books is just the latest in the long, long list of coinky-dink cover ups with zero.
There is no provenance for documents of any kind or eyewitness on any claimed record for any “Anna Obama” who was supposedly NOT Stanley Ann Dunham Obama and who was supposedly married to BHO SR or who attended any of these institutions instead of SADO or that this other Anna was ever in Seattle with or without a baby in January of 1961.
It is totally a conspiracy theory to fabricate an imaginary alternate “Anna Obama” out of whole cloth and claiming her to be the "real" Anna Obama and claim that all public documents relating to Stanley Ann in three public institutions are fake.
All of the public records for Stanley Ann can be verified to be (or not to be) at these institutions in the custody of the registrars or other custodians.
The claimed provenance for documents that certain named officials sent out as verification of attendance or as a transcript on letterhead and under a signature can be verified in court by the custodians of the public records who can be called to testify.
This is a perfect falsifiable interlocking chain of claims of provenance for evidence for Stanley Ann at the three institutions which doesn't exist for the alternate Anna Obama at all to date from what I have seen.
So I leave it for you and all FReepers reading this to decide who is creating deliberate distraction, thread hijacking and conspiracy theories out of thin air.
Remember, only when evidence is actually presented in a court can any alleged provenance of any kind be proved.
Thank you for the ping LucyT :)
WOW.. very interesting
“ASSUMES” ?
I won’t go there....promise.
btw, saw on the Internet a link to "Saberpoint photos of Obama s mother nude," supposedly at a French blog. I did not click on it. If it had been S. Palin's mother, the media would have gone wild over it, true or not.