[Fred Nerks]

...If you get that far, you surmise that Anna was pregnant; she was the woman whose father rejected the idea of the black son in law; she left Hawaii in the fall of 1961 and delivered the baby in Kenya.

If we allow for Mary telling the truth when she was first contacted, that she baby-sat for ANNA when her own daughter was 18 months of age in July, 1959...then ANN/ANNA would have left Hawaii shortly AFTER the birth, if that UNDATED index listing for OBAMA 11 Barack Hussein was ANNA'S CHILD.

"I WAS HERE WHEN THAT CHILD WAS BORN..." ABERCROMBIE SAID...'I SAW THE NAME WRITTEN DOWN SOMEWHERE..."

There must have been a reason why the BIRTH INDEX was the only index from which the DATE RANGE WAS REMOVED:

...The images above are offered as proof that the Birth Index volume is in fact quite different in an important way. It is the only one that lacks the date range. It seems improbable that this would be innocently “overlooked” only in this one book. To suggest so is ridiculous. That is why I published images from the other “types” of books that were printed at the same time the 1960-1964 Birth Index was printed, to show absolutely that the obama Index is the only book lacking the one common, expected, usual official information. The date range.

SOURCE LINK

[Fred Nerks]

Afterthought:

It just crossed my mind...one reason to remove the date range from the Birth Index might be...it appears each index covers four years. The others shown are 1960-1964.

The previous Index might well have been 1956-60. Perhaps the index with the OBAMA name was from that previous date range?

Naughty...