Better question might be...who were the parents and why the NEED for an ID? Where do I THINK he is? See previous comment
2) I keep going back to David. Not that I believe a word of "Dreams" but why the heck would Ayers go so far as to include that David was the spitting image of the usurper? Why all the secrecy surrounding David? Then there's the motorcycle accident and the usurper's head scars, etc.
Because he HAD to be related...and therefor he HAD to look like him, and it was a good way to get rid of one boy too many? The dark boy apparently ended up in Ghana, he added EKUA to his name, which in swahili, means 'pushed or shoved aside'
Motorcycle accident? I very much doubt it...
3) Is there any relation between this and Sarah's statement (subject to interpretation, whatever) of some baby passing through her hands and other relatives stating the same?
Think about the headline of this Post. The family DID receive a letter. That child DID end up in Kenya to start with, so why wouldn't it have 'passed through her hands'?
What's up with Mark posting that picture and not taking it down?
The two boys he identifies as David and Mark appear to me to be zero and the Dark Boy. Draw your own conclusions? Surely he would know who those children really are?
Boggles the mind why so many are aiding and abetting.