SAD was only 5' and a half inch, according to her passport data.
Posted on 04/11/2011 8:55:58 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
BOSTON - Barack Obama's aunt, Zeituni Onyango, says Donald Trump disrespected her family by questioning the president's birthplace.
Trump quoted Obama's grandmother when she claimed to have witnessed Barack Obama's birth in Kenya, and Onyango says that is not true.....
(Excerpt) Read more at kplctv.com ...
NANNY STANNEY!
Brilliant comment, seems Hawaii would have fitted right in there with the attendees of the BANDUNG CONFERENCE held in Indonesia - which the associate of Frank Marshall Davis, RICHARD WRIGHT attended...and of which Malcolm X often spoke in various speeches.
There’s no doubt about it IMO. And SAD wasn’t the mother. He spent so much time in the middle east...
He’s obviously smoking the best that money can buy, then and now. They grow tons of it in Hawaii.
And Zero has demonstrated no affection or attachment to any of the Dunham family members. Dying Grandma? Rushes off a few days later, spends 45 minutes. Tosses some ashes off onto the rocks for a photo op. Etc. Cold. And the photo of Zero with Stanley and Madelyn Dunham in Central Park obviously photoshopped. Not a family relationship.
PENNY JUST DROPPED!
The 'brilliant insight' is all yours...now we know how the 'two little boys' came to be photogaphed together, one zero, the other about SEVEN MONTHS older...and inadvertently, 'Dreams' has told us WHERE that photograph was taken!
It would tell us that someone named Anna who was not Stanley Ann Dunham gave birth to a child named Barack Hussein Obama on a different birth date than the myth tells us.
That immediately brings up the question: Is the BHO who is the son of “Anna” the same guy who sits in the White House who calls himself BHO?
I think it’s about time to get some DNA samples from a few people. Maya Ng, Mark N (can’t spell name), and one of Malcolm X’s children. And of course Zero.
That will tell us who is and who ain’t related to who.
We’d have to wonder - hmmm, why has this been hidden? So BHO’s mother is not Stanley Ann, but someone else. What else is a lie? And look at EVERYTHING to determine whether it is false or true.
SAD was only 5' and a half inch, according to her passport data.
Barry is wearing a costume. Is this for Halloween?
Did they have Halloween in Hawaii?
Can any identify the plant in the back ground as being indigenous to Hawaii?
And why do we have all these pictures of a toddler and not one baby pic?...I know that last one was rhetorical.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=751#751
I would feel a whole lot more sure about that, if the information from the U of WA had come first...and the discovery of the address for ANNA OBAMA followed, instead of the other way around. There were a number of class of 1960 MIHS graduates who attended the U of WA IN 1961, AND IF ANYONE OF THEM had come forward and said; "I was at/saw her at the University of Washington" AND THEN Charlette Le Fevre found the address as a RESULT, that would sit a whole lot better.
That isn't realistic. You don't understand how big Washington is. If my memory is correct, there were between three and five thousand Freshman in the entering class. I was well known; with high school friends from three classes on four sport's teams; maybe a dozen of my friends were at the U as were many of my other classmates. The only person from High School I remember seeing my first year was a friend I saw every day--because he lived half a block from my home and I drove him to school every day; where we had the same majors; and were in the same non academic program.
I agree with your need to be suspicious of every fact you turn over in this effort. And I have conceded your point that the possibility exists that the U of W transcript record was modified. I don't think it happened because I do not have any idea how it would have been accomplished. I know what the security arrangements were like and they were designed to keep people from doing anything with the real record--in part for the reason that there was real money on the table for academic performance.
The U of W transcript is a very important document. Because if it is real, it attests to her 1960 Mercer Island graduation; it attests to the U of Hawaii portion of the fairy tale.
It is important also to understand the sequence of the U of W record documents. The computer printout was generated long after the fact. At some point, the U like other institutions, converted its students records to the machine. I do not know when that occurred.
I do know that my own undergraduate record all of which is prior to Fall Quarter, 1961, was not converted because I have seen copies of my transcripts within the last ten or twelve years and they are photocopies of the old style records with the appended certificate.
At the conversion point, a decision had to be made which records to convert for existing students; obviously records of some earlier students were also converted. How they decided whose records to convert is not clear to me.
But the original transcript for Stanley Ann looks like a pretty regular form for what was in use in 1961.
I agree that there is room for doubt because of the circumstances. But there is nothing on the piece of paper that contradicts the legend.
The largest gap is the possibility that someone else might have claimed to have been Stanley Ann and assumed the paper record you see. At that point, you need to ask yourself at what point the person was substituted.
You can understand that the legend which accepts her presence in Seattle in August of 1961 does not include any mention of the prospect that she would attend the U in the Fall Quarter for the reason that the author's did not want you to know that occurred.
As a matter of fact, the desire of the author's to eliminate that information must be the only excuse for why it is not there. Because in looking at what you do know, if you accept the admission deadline of August 1 as applicable to the Night School as well as the regular college (which I believe was the case) Stanley Ann had made the decision to attend Washington sometime before mid July 1961--before Obama would have been born if the August 4 birthdate is accurate.
Wherever she came from to Seattle in August 1961; however she got there; whether or not she had a multi racial child with her; she was there to start school at the University of Washington Fall Quarter. The fact that the witnesses are not on record telling you so proves either that she didn't tell them; or that they have been told not to tell you. I don't find the first alternative probable.
Where that photograph was taken is unknown...but the plant appears to be a frangipanni...and IF there were any mother-and-baby images, we would have been shown them by now...
Just like the Certification of Live Birth shown on fightthesmears website is 'real'?
...As a matter of fact, the desire of the author's to eliminate that information must be the only excuse for why it is not there...
It's NOT THERE because ANNA OBAMA wasn't meant to be discovered. Charlette Le Fevre upset the apple-cart...and the rest of the U of WA story follows from there.
Don’t let the plant life in the background put you off your conclusion. The background of the pirate photo looks like a mural because the two people have been cut out of another photo and placed there.
Anybody who has an image program - use it on this photo, enlarge the photo 400% and look around SAD’s head. Whoever did it made no attempt at blending. It’s pathetically obvious what was done.
The pirate accessories had been added to Barry as well.
The question then is, was there ever an image to start with? I mean...no matter how it may have been enhanced or tampered with, WAS THERE A PHOTOGRAPH of zero and SAD to start with? It’s not a hologram...it had to be a PHOTOGRAPH!
And why turn a little boy into a pirate by adding a costume?
See my comment at 1094.
(http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2702976/posts?page=1094#1094)
There are other “tells” in this photo. Have a look at SAD’s hand splayed across toddler Barry’s chest. Again, pathetic. I also think, though I haven’t checked it, that she has Zero’s adult eyes again.
This also would make sense that the cyber security company that handled the government’s system after “Passportgate” during the primary is the same company that Thomas Ayers was CEO of...
Although I do not go along with ALL of the image comparisons on the video, at 8.22 there's a fascinating example of how a cloning tool is used. That shows how the '1960 Graduation image' may have been created. FOR EXAMPLE:
Interesting.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.