Your argument is silly. If the Constitution doesn’t grant a power to say stop citizens from re-defining murder or re-defining marraige then in your mind it a natural right for you to redefine these things?
And you do not have to respect your fellow citizens right to representation on the issue? You can just unilaterally secede and change the definition of marraige or murder?
Oh wait. That is what you are arguing. I see it now. It is the same as the democrats of today argue as well. The Constitution is a document for you to rebel against and force change upon.
Pathetic.
“life, liberty and pursuit of happiness” covers murder, and marriage is not an issue for D.C. to decide (yet), but as usual you’ve put a lot of thought into your post.
if you believe that a central government can grasp the needs and cultures from alaska to florida, maine to new mexico and legislate more effectively for each than their local governments can, then you’ve truly grasped what makes (made) us different than every other oppressive government in history. please allow me some time to re-indoctrinate myself until i agree with your wisdom.