Personally, I am **disgusted** with our highest military. I just posted the following about the military on another thread:
I doubt where our highest military officers would stand if true tyranny would come to the U.S.
There are really four, not three, balances of power when it comes to the Constitution. That fourth power is the military and their **sacred** oath to defend the Constitution. They are the last bulwark against needing to use the Second Amendment.
If the highest military leaders are willing to bow down and lick the boots of a corrupt Congress, Supreme Court, President, and a beguiled voting public, coupled with election fraud, then sadly, when facing true tyranny from a domestic enemy, a Second Amendment solution would become inevitable.
Ok...So why am I now concerned?
I was appalled by how the highest military have handled Obama’s eligibility. They are either brain dead or deliberately ignoring a serious question of corruption in the chain of command. When did ignoring suspected corruption and lying become part of the military code of honor? When did protecting the exposure of fraud become these highest officers’ duty? Is this how they fulfill their duty to the men and women serving under them, or is this how they protect their perks and pensions?
Is there any evidence that these highest military officers **peacefully** and **lawfully** sought certifiable clarification of Obama’s natural born citizenship from Congress, the courts, or Obama?
I am disgusted. Who would ever believe that we would see our military women wearing head scarves, or needing to call an attorney for permission to shoot the enemy? Why are we using our soldiers to prop up regimes that are blatantly open about their determination to kill our soldiers and destroy the U.S., and condemn Christian converts to death? How can our highest military be loyal to that especially when these orders are coming from a likely usurper?
Question: How can ignoring a very likely usurper in the White House be upholding one’s oath to defend the Constitution?!!!! Why aren’t theses highest military officers** peacefully** and **lawfully** seeking certifiable clarification of Obama’s eligibility? Why aren't they peacefully and lawfully holding a press conference, speaking out, and then handing in their resignations?
While these highest level officers may be willing to fall on a grenade for their troops in a battle against a foreign enemy, it appears they surely won't protect their troops from corruption and fraud if it means a damaged or truncated career and loss of perks. It also seems that they are even willing to let their troops unnecessarily die due to rules of engagement dictated from a likely usurper rather than risk a career, perk, or pension.
If in the unlikely event that I am in the company of these highest military officers, I will shun them. I will turn my back.
Terry Lakin spoke up. He’s now in prison.
He spoke up, and no superior officer supported him.
It’s not just benefits they are afraid of losing.