I didn’t know history had an expiration date.
One gains creditability by bouncing back from the bottom.
It absolutely has a relevant date.
You don’t like Trump, that’s okay. I’m not really down with him at this point and think his whole posturing is just part of his PR schtick.
But you post an article from 2004 and don’t bother to tell us it’s not current events but history.
The site you posted from has right at the top “This story was originally published on August 11, 2004”.
You think that was okay? It’s right? The time has relevancy to the story.
BTW, the link you gave is from 2007 and a reprint of the original.