I can’t figure out that out either..
To me the questions are obvious
1. Why is he trying to hide his B.C.?
2. How can he be natural born with a (supposed) father who was a citizen of another country
3. Should a POTUS even be allowed to hide his B.C.?
Why are so many in the media acting like these are ridiculous questions??? I don’t get it.
Speaking for the "unbiased" media such as Oreilly and Beck and others we like more who are much more unbiased than the two names mentioned.
The answer is:
1) They do not understand the diffence between native born and natural born or even if it does make a difference.
or
2) They assume a birth certificate is the document we are all familiar with (without parents info) and they do not know what a long version is.
or
3) They do suspect something but figure "hey, what the heck. He's President now. Just let it ride"
This birthler stuff makes me go wild. Don’t we have something better to do instead of this tin foil hat like issue ? Something like winning the next election for the GOP ?
1. Why is he trying to hide his B.C.?
Did he hide it ? He only didn’t show it doesn’t mean he’s hiding it. Maybe he or his mum simply lost it on one of their moves around the world.
2. How can he be natural born with a (supposed) father who was a citizen of another country
His mother was american, he (might) have been born on US soil, so what ? Does that mean that EVERY child of a american single mom who’s dady is unknown is UNEGLIBLE ?
3. Should a POTUS even be allowed to hide his B.C.?
NO. He should at least show up a certified copy as he did.
And copy does not mean “photo” copy but a “literal” copy.