Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
No it is the Ahole’s fault entirely. It he doesn’t do it there is nothing for the media to report.

How can you say it's his fault??

I'll be the first to admit that when things like this are done, the risk level increases for those of us in the Middle East.

I was here when the Abu Ghraib story broke and hell yeah, there was a significant uptick in mortars and rockets coming in on our bases.

But the response to this sort of thing should NOT be any form of appeasement EVER.

OK, somebody burned a Koran. We have the freedom of expression, so the guy didn't violate any laws by burning that Koran.

Our response to the resultant murders of innocents should be to BOMB THE HELL out of the mosque these savages spilled from and then find as many of the perps as possible and EXECUTE THEM swiftly. Do like we did to Zarqawi in '06.

All this wimpy talk from idiots like Reid, Kerry and Graham is just worsening the situation.

And don't EVEN get me started on the idiocy of asking our women soldiers to wear the hijab...

157 posted on 04/04/2011 3:46:43 AM PDT by Allegra (Hey! Stop looking at my tagline like that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Allegra
People who like to stage provocative stunts like this do no good to anyone and are frauds through and through. Raising the risk to our people is just short of treason which is why I have continually called the media the Treason media because it constantly tries to undermine our effort with lies and misinformation.

“Freedom of Expression” is NOT a phrase in the Constitution. What is guaranteed is freedom of speech. The former term is an invention of the courts. And is quite recent in our history. If the Founders had meant freedom of expression they would have said that clearly since their ability to communicate and understand were unparalleled far beyond the mental midgets of our era.

Can you imagine what people here say in the 19th century would have done to an “artist” who dunked the cross in urine? They would never have argued that this was his right under freedom of expression.

But all that aside, who can argue that this was a good idea?
Who can argue that it was a Christian thing to do? Who can argue that it does not aid our national interest? That is all I am speaking about but that does not stop the whackjobs from acting as though I am the Twelfth Iman or pray to Mecca five times a day.

174 posted on 04/04/2011 11:22:04 AM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson