Forged documents, even the most professionally done, are easily detectable by experts.
That is why only originals are accepted aprovidence in a Court of Law. Forensic experts can determine within a reasonable doubt authenticity by age testing paper, ink, handwriting analysis for signatures, & comparison woth contemporaneous documents.
Remember the GWB/Dan Rather kerfuffel?
Busted by a blogger!
You’re correct. But there is more to the situation.
There must be hand-recorded records from 1961 in Hawaii’s Department of Health to validate the acceptance and recording of the birth certificate. Such records exist for other’s birth certificates from 1961, so it is not simply that he can ‘Voila!’, produce the document.
If there are laws in several States requiring the production of the birth certificate for verification of candidate’s eligibility, Hawaii must respond with certified copies of said document when requested.
Abercrombie has already flubbed; he has said that no birth certificate exists. He has also fired one of his hand-picked officials before that man could take office.
Something stinks in paradise.
But the lame stream media will ignore all of this if Obama produces the vaunted birth certificate and especially if Trump makes a big deal over being convinced it is valid.
This is why it is very important that States pass initiatives this year that require candidates for President and Vice President to submit long-form birth certificates, not just of themselves but of their parents too.
Do you understand where I am coming from on this?