Again, lying and misleading. The article clearly denotes in each paragraph that contains a link whether the link is to a NEWS STORY, a blog, a book review, an encyclopedia, an AOL story, a book, a genealogical article, etc. There are NUMEROUS NEWS STORIES linked. You simply do not want people to see and realize the truth.
Do you all notice how incurious moves the goal post? First denigrate all the links as blogs. Then, when proven wrong, redefine what a news article is. It all depends upon what the definition of is, is. You see? It’s impossible to debate HONESTLY with people like this, who won’t even agree upon what WORDS mean. If we have no common language, then it’s useless to continue to speak.
“Suppose” my claim is right?!! After being presented with NUMEROUS examples that PROVE my “claim” IS RIGHT, you still persist in calling it a “claim” and just “supposing” it’s right. IT IS RIGHT AND YOU CAN’T EVEN BRING YOURSELF TO ADMIT IT.
What is it so important that her name was first Shirley and then suddenly became Stanley? Why is it important that he first was born in Queen’s Medical and then in Kapiolani? Why is it so important that first Dr. West delivered him but then he didn’t? Why is it so important that he ADMITS THAT HIS LIFE STORY IS A LIE? He does, you know.
It’s important because there is plenty of evidence that indicates he is NOT who and what he claims that he is and NO EVIDENCE to support that he is who and what he claims that he is. That’s why.
All you have evidence for is that at some point, a handful of reporters got his mom's first name wrong and his birth hospital wrong. You don't have any evidence of Obama or any member of his family changing the story.
Why is it so important that first Dr. West delivered him but then he didn’t?
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Please elaborate.
Why is it so important that he ADMITS THAT HIS LIFE STORY IS A LIE? He does, you know.
Really? Where does he admit that?
It’s important because there is plenty of evidence that indicates he is NOT who and what he claims that he is and NO EVIDENCE to support that he is who and what he claims that he is.
A handful of reporters getting facts wrong 50 years after they happend is not evidnece of anything. Reporters are human, after all, and they make mistakes.
As to your claim that there is "no evidence to to support that he is who and what he claims that he is," that is simply false.
There is evidence that he attended Kindergarten where he says he did:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/03/remembering-barack-obama/
People who knew his parents affirm that he was their child. Several teachers have stated they new him at his elemenatry school and high school. There are photos of him attending school in Indonesia, and a student registration document from an Indonesian private school is in the public domain. Classmates who knew him both at Occidental and Columbia have come forward. His name is on the graduation program at Columbia. Both Occidental and Columbia have publicly affirmed that he was a student there. One could go on and on.
Tell me, what aspect of his life do you think is missing evidence?