[curiosity]

That sounds like a theory and not a fact.

It's no less than a theory than the contention that his SSN is fraudulant. The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.

The fact is Obama had a Connecticut SS#.

Sure, and it means nothing.

He never corrected the problem if indeed there is any validity to your theory.

There is no problem to correct.

[PA Engineer]

The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.

What theory? Fact. He had a Connecticut SS#. Worse. He had a dead man's social security number! You are holding onto a conclusion in search of pixie dust facts to support it. Deal with it rather than trying to explain away the obvious.

HE HAD A DEAD MAN'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER.

There was no agency screw up there. There is no reach up the butt theory of plausible deniability either. Move along.

[DustyMoment]

It's no less than a theory than the contention that his SSN is fraudulant. The only difference is that my theory actually fits the facts, whereas yours does not.

Ah, you're an Obamabot!!

How does your theory explain why no less than 9 SSNs have been connected to Obama, as other researchers have found?