true , only the A.G. of the United states and the A.G. of the district of Columbia has standing to request a quo warranto for obama. since this will not happen, it’s still up to Congress to remove obama, who can use quo warranto.
You are correct. In his opinion in Taitz v Obama, Judge Lamberth said that a Writ of Quo Warranto can be requested by an interested third party and his interpretation of that statement, based on legal precedents in other cases, is that an interested party must be a representative of the people, meaning Congress or another federally elected official, like the Vice President.
Therefore, it is likely that any member of Congress could request a Writ of Quo Warranto against Obama from either the Attorney General or the US Attorney for the District of Columbia and if those officials refuse the request, a member of Congress could go to the US District Court for the District of Columbia(just like Orly Taitz did) and a judge could grant the quo warranto request under the DC Code, forcing Obama to show by what authority he holds the position of President of the United States.
However, in the two plus years since Obama was inaugurated, no member of Congress has sought a Writ of Quo Warranto.
I believe that every member of congress is told by party leaders that if they attempt to remove obama it would destroy their careers and our country could end up in a civil war. And if they don't agree to keep quite,maybe their lives re threatened. You realize what would happen if everything obama had signed , or appointments made were suddenly void. It could very well destroy both the Republican and the Democratic party. it would be worth it to restore the Constitution and save our country.