Posted on 03/03/2011 4:25:44 AM PST by The Working Man
A vanity question here.
A friend of my wife was asking for advice.
The situation: Her Husband works for the City. They just received a notice that all of the spouses of the covered employees MUST show up, as in mandatory, for a meeting with the Health Care insurer for a question and answer session and then give a blood sample.
So, with that as the situation. Her question to my wife was; Why do they want a blood sample from the spouses?
I don't know anything further than what she told my wife. So I think that what I am asking for is this.
Has anyone experienced a similar situation lately?
Any idea; Why the mandatory blood sample?
“If your spouse has HIV, dont you think your health insurance company has the right to use that info in deciding the amount of your premium?”
I didn’t say it was either a good policy or a bad policy. I(1) said I’d never heard of it before, and (2) implied that Big Brother is intrusive.
When a government negotiates insurance premiums for a group, each individual employee is not reviewed on a case-by-case basis. At least, that was the case when I was involved in negotiations.
I'm going through roughly the same thing (although no blood tests, not yet) with my employer. Currently, there's a "wellness program" that we get some hard armtwisting to participate in. Next year, we've been told that we'll have mandatory screening, and a 'life coach' (read: company-approved nanny) will "help" us with areas in which we're found lacking.
I'm looking for another job.
But, to the point, although we've been assured that all results are completely confidential (then, how would the company know that we need a 'life coach', or even if we're seeing one? I asked, and was told that I asked too many questions), I had exactly the same thoughts as you. Not healthy enough? That'll get you on the short list when layoffs come. Particularly if there's someone in the dept who has the same qualifications, but ISN'T on statins, or blood pressure meds, or something.
“Concent is a fuzzy word. Do you want the insurance? Do they require a blood test to get the insurance?
It’s all about the actuarial tables, or should be. The question should come down to “Who is assuming what level of risk, and for what premium?” Well......pre-ObamaCare anyway.
If you’re marking “no” to things like HIV and cancer, or not listing those types of things, the blood test is to verify that you’re telling the truth or not withholding information.
It would be very tempting for someone who is in the beginning stages of cancer to sign up for insurance and then afterward say “Oops - what are the chances of that?”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.