Posted on 02/28/2011 7:00:54 PM PST by Politics4US
That’s the point I’m making. All the people we once liked and supported are changing, or at least letting out their true feelings, lol. Maybe they’re all just great actors...
[You gotta give me all three deckers on that Triple Whopper of Conservatism]
The problem with that is that no one is perfect. I always disliked some of Anne’s quips but everyone liked her so much.
.
CHANGE/2012
.
Charlie Cook;
Cook: Dems Are in for Two Terrible Cycles in 2012 and 2014...
http://www.nationaljournal.com/video-charlie-cook-looks-into-senate-s-future-20110228
I’m not saying every candidate is going to vote a 100 percent Conservative voting record...but if we are conservatives, we can expect the GOP candidates to vote generally is all three of the pillars of conservatism.
If they don’t, that is fine, but they are not conservatives...the;y may be economic conservatives or they may only be national security conservatives...but that is different from being a conservative.
So either Obama is ineligible to be President or the biggest retard to occupy the Oval Office for putting himself in such a lose-lose situation.
I think the former to be true as much as I would like to believe the latter.
Perhaps she has made all the money she could from conservatives, time to find another friend..
Amusing comments on this thread. I didn’t find the “oblgatory” Ann Coulter pic as was typical in the past.
I have agreed with much of what the lady said in the past, but believed she did not effectively articulate her stance in the TV media (haven’t read any of her books). In other words, I thought she was okay, but certainly not a standout.
However, I did listen to both youtubes with the radio guy and didn’t find anything in them that would warrant all the anathema directed at her herein. Her somewhat unnatural admiration for Chris Christie appears to skew a couple of the opinions, but what she says about Chrisie’s “balls” and the use of the birther issue by libtards does make sense (I do believe it is an issue, nevertheless). The Michelle foodfest is a low on the totem pole issue.
I wonder how many of those that commented actually listened to both youtubes.
She did not “attack” birthers, she just opined that it was not a winning issue.
I was hooked on Ann before I saw Palin. That is Ann’s problem. Palin is the real deal.
I have no idea what’s happened to her, except for maybe she’s getting a lot of attention.
Need I remind you that she’s from CT? And, an attention whore?
Well, after a few thousand injections you have to expect some reaction.
What she said about Christie’s appointments was bad, the birth certificate, and Michelle Obama’s nutrition plan. Obama isn’t hiding the bc to make the right look bad. She’s afraid to talk about it.
A lot of this seems to be driven by hatred of Sarah Palin.
She said earlier that she decided to support Chris Christie so as to head off Mitt Romney from getting the nomination and then losing.
That is curious, since she was one of the earlier supporters of Mitt Romney in the last primary cycle. She was one of the gang of “conservative” pundits who came out early for Romney because he was “electable.”
Well, anyone can make a mistake. But I don’t like to see her making the same mistake twice in a row. Especially with all the other very strange things she has said recently.
Too late.
“..all the other very strange things she has said recently.”
I’m gonna have to agree that she fell off the deep end tonite on Hannity. Her passion for Christie is approaching the stalking level. She bashed Walker as not being aggressive enough. Hannity pinned her down on Christie’s gun control and immigration positions and she didn’t want to talk about that. Kinda reminds me of the Glenn Close, Michael Douglas movie. I think maybe it’s time for the lady to pack it in and go home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.