Argument already presented: Rand Paul defines the same road. You’re in favor. It’s just that simple.
And you have failed to defend that argument. To the contray, I have pointed out that what you have presented to defend that argument actually does the opposite. Rand Paul said that if the RINOs keep spending, the Tea Party will primary them next opportunity. That does not sound like a defense of RINOs to anyone with two functioning neurons to rub together.
You are so arrogant that you think that just because you have made the claim, it is therefore true. You're a joke, and a bad one at that.