[RogerFGay]

Yes that's absolutely right. I was born less than a half hour before I wrote the article and immediately focused my attention on the YouTube video as the first thing I ever did - writing the article immediately after. I know absolutely nothing other than what I heard in the YouTube video. It's an amazing feat of magic that I have the ability to write in English, or even to have understood what was said in the video - or to have gotten to it on the Internet for that matter. Absolutely - no other knowledge than less than 10 minutes of Letterman.

LOL!

[ejonesie22]

If you read the article, and I did twice, that is exactly what it sounds like you are dong. Basing an argument that Rand Paul is not interested in the Constitution on a three response segment on Letterman.

Not saying you are right or wrong, just what the article implies.

I think you can understand that just because he did not say the word Constitution in an otherwise reasonable reply is not a sound basis for the argument and why that would seem a little bit of a stretch. Perhaps including some of this other information would broaden the basis of your point.

[txlurker]

Hey get pissy if you want, you wrote the stupid article basing it on the Letterman interview.

What a condescending little man you appear to be. At least I now know better than to read any other bit of nonsense that dribbles from your elitist little brain.

The Mens News Daily part should have been a red flag.