Col. Ralph Peters says Obama fails US, human rights, and the cause of freedom

Examiner ^ | February 24, 2011 | Marc Schenker

[Suvroc10]

Col. Ralph Peters says Obama fails the US, human rights, and the cause of freedom. Col. Ralph Peters has, as the years of Barack Obama’s first term have worn on, become one of the most blunt and absolute critics of the president, especially with regards to the president’s mismanagement of the image of the US around the world. The all-hell-breaking-loose catastrophe in Libya is motivating the colonel to launch another round of criticism against the president. Yesterday, after first giving props to Rahm Emmanuel for his Chicago mayoral win and standing by quietly for days as Muammar Gaddafi mass-murdered his own people, Obama finally came out of his shell to address the Libya slaughter. However, in Peters’ words, Obama even failed there, as he was “mega-wimpy” when addressing Gaddafi.

[JimSEA]

I am often sarcastic about Obama’s performance, both domestically and internationally but his lack of competence recently is frightening. He has an agenda which is very much in oposition to American interests. Libya is just one example.

[Carley]

After reading that Khadaffi wrote big checks to Nation of Islam’s Farrakhan it’s clear to see why O is not about making statements that K should step down IMMEDIATELY.

He most likely wants to be sure that K gets his money safely hidden.

[cranked]

1) Peters is correct.
2) Peters is only confirming what some of us have long stated, indicated, or suggested.

[Lessthantolerant]

A liberal friend of mine told me last night, “This growth of Democracy Rage” is a direct result of Obama. This fool sees the problems around the world as the “Change and Hope” offered by Obama to Islam.

He actually believe that this fool has created an atmosphere of islamic followers decidih to throw off their leadership and begin a new ear of democratic rule.

I think I have finally had enough of my friends deluional justification of Obama Love.

[no-to-illegals]

As more and more current and ex-Military express their thoughts concerning the failure of 0, I am in awe of the Honor, Duty, and Love of Country by those speaking up. 0 is possibly losing the ear of our Military leaders. I do not see this as bad news. A civilian Military, as ours is, should be able to express what they think is a truthful opinion. My thought is our nation would be stronger, if this were policy instead of the policy of removing anyone who would dare disagree with 0. This is not a popular opinion, I hold, for discipline must be held in the ranks, as most would put forth as an argument against the fore-stated opinion. Blind leading the blind is preferred policy, one would think.

[Hotlanta Mike]