[Red Steel]

Yup, it is scheduled for rehearing in March:

No. 10-678
Title:	Gregory S. Hollister, Petitioner v. Barry Soetoro, et al.
Docketed:	November 23, 2010
Lower Ct:	United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Case Nos.:	(09-5080)
Decision Date:	March 22, 2010
Rehearing Denied:	August 23, 2010

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings  and  Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nov 22 2010	Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 23, 2010)
Nov 22 2010	Appendix of Gregory S. Hollister filed. (Volumes I, II, III)
Dec 22 2010	Waiver of right of respondents Barry Soetoro, et al. to respond filed.
Dec 29 2010	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of January 14, 2011.
Dec 30 2010	Request for recusal received from petitioner.
Jan 18 2011	Petition DENIED.
Feb 7 2011	Petition for Rehearing filed.
Feb 16 2011	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 4, 2011.

---

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
John David Hemenway	4816 Rodman Street, NW	(202) 244-4819
	Washington, DC  20016
	johndhemenway@comcast.net
Party name: Gregory S. Hollister
Attorneys for Respondents:
Marc Erik Elias	Perkins Coie, LLP	(202)-434-1609
Counsel of Record	700 Thirteenth Street, NW, Suite 600
	Washington, DC  20005-3960
	melias@perkinscoie.com
Party name: Barry Soetoro, et al.

[Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!]

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/10-678.htm

Can someone tell me if this is the first time Barry Soetoro and not Barack Obama was sued? Or if the fact that a sitting President has an alias and why? Or why all of his records are sealed?

[little jeremiah]

Rehearing.

hmm.

[bgill]

Party name: Barry Soetoro, et al.

"Et al" is right. A rose stink weed by any other name would stink the same.

[American Constitutionalist]

2 weeks from now.