Actually, it has yet to be proven. That he was allegedly born in HI is hearsay, alluded to (while not under oath) via a press conference and talk radio show, and via a jpeg of an alleged short form on the WWW.
Until a court of law subpoena's a copy of the original (or amended) long form...his true birth location (and age, and father/mother, etc) remains unverified.
That is complete and utter nonsense. “while not under oath”, why does someone need to be under oath to make a statement of pure fact? The fact is that the birth cerificate is on file with the State. The fact is that the Birthers like to treat this as a criminal or civil issue, even though they’ve been laughed out of every court they’ve went to (and wasn’t one of the head Birthers even fined for brining this nonsense before the court?), but they refuse to submit one scintilla of evidence that supports their claims or even their standing to bring a case.
“Until a court of law subpoena’s a copy of the original (or amended) long form...his true birth location (and age, and father/mother, etc) remains unverified.” Just like about every other president in the history of the country.
Finally, I find it laughably absurd that the statement of the officials in charge of the vital records is dismissed as “hearsay”, when the Birthers glom on to every single out-of-context or butchered remark made by Michelle Obama, the Kenyan ambassador, or even a Hollywood reporter (!) to further their cause.