Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another look
wnd.com ^ | 02/17/2011 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 02/17/2011 1:04:49 PM PST by rxsid

"Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another look
Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court

In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.

The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.

It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.

Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.

At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.

..."

From: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=264897

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: certifigate; hollister; naturalborncitizen; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-258 next last
To: patlin

Welcome back! We missed your postings. The struggle continues.

The Obots continue lusting for their golden calf aka presumed citizen obama.


141 posted on 02/17/2011 3:39:05 PM PST by bushpilot1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone; Lurking Libertarian

I was trying to reply and couldn’t! Good you did.

Basically if the fraudulent “officer” was ignorant, and found out later, that’s one thing. But if the fraud was known about beforehand, then all is null and void.


142 posted on 02/17/2011 3:43:09 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
I don't think there is any chance in hell that SCOTUS will touch this. If Obama were found to be ineligible, it would shake our country to it's core. If everything he has signed as president were suddenly invalid all the budget bills would be invalid. How would you resolve all the laws being invalid and all the money that has already been spent?

It could easily completely crash our economy, and devolve our government into utter chaos.

If several states legislate strict methods of proving eligibility to get on the ballot, then Obama would either have to prove eligibility in the next election, or come up with a reason to not run again.

However, I see absolutely no chance that if he isn't eligible that we will ever see it proved.

143 posted on 02/17/2011 3:52:53 PM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: King_Corey

Both Barry and Biden resign.

Boehner resigns as Speaker of the House and as a Representative.

Boehner acts as President. [i.e. Acting President]

No Presidential Oath is administered.

An Order of the United States Supreme Court could memorialize this as future legal precedent.


144 posted on 02/17/2011 4:07:41 PM PST by bigoil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

While that’s good news, I’m not going to hold my breath that they won’t continue to evade it and the US Constitution.


145 posted on 02/17/2011 4:11:50 PM PST by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Every law he’s signed, Every appointment he’s made, Every Executive Order he’s issued, Everything he’s done in office is on the line..........

Will we be able to get back the trillion dollars spent as "stimulus"?
Will GM and Chrysler have to go back to being broke and maybe out of business?

Will the people who were sent into battle by Obama and died be brought back to life?

Far too many things that should not have happened because somebody was elected president and was not even legally qualified to run.
146 posted on 02/17/2011 4:14:25 PM PST by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel
Party name: Barry Soetoro, et al.

"Et al" is right. A rose stink weed by any other name would stink the same.

147 posted on 02/17/2011 4:14:55 PM PST by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

Why is Kagan named in those filings?


148 posted on 02/17/2011 4:17:36 PM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: ebysan
Mr Obama’s........ “Legal”.......... father was a “Kenyan with British Citizenship”.

His legal father is still speculation because he's sealed his records so all we have is heresay from him and his ghost writer, Ayers.

149 posted on 02/17/2011 4:17:53 PM PST by bgill (Kenyan Parliament - how could a man born in Kenya who is not even a native American become the POTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
I don't think there is any chance in hell that SCOTUS will touch this. If Obama were found to be ineligible, it would shake our country to it's core. If everything he has signed as president were suddenly invalid all the budget bills would be invalid. How would you resolve all the laws being invalid and all the money that has already been spent? It could easily completely crash our economy, and devolve our government into utter chaos. If several states legislate strict methods of proving eligibility to get on the ballot, then Obama would either have to prove eligibility in the next election, or come up with a reason to not run again. However, I see absolutely no chance that if he isn't eligible that we will ever see it proved.

IMHO... I think Chief Justice is the one who tipped the scales against hearing this and perhaps this may have changed, with world events unfolding as they are.

As far as invalidating his acts thus far, members of Congress can have their staffs negotiate between themselves and come up with whatever is needed and pass it. Obviously, Obama's strongest supporters could create a large unrest if he was impeached. I think it seems like as this and other aspects of Obama start caving in on him, the Democrats not supporting him to run again seems more likely. It appears though that world events are making some people in high places concerned that him staying in office two more years may not work. If evidence of his ineligibility is not made public, it will be within a few decades.

Looks to me like before the next election cycle gets into full swing he may be asked to offer his resignation, which could make the whole ineligibility issue disappear for a few decades. I would think that would have to happen before a SCOTUS ruling, though. That would take all the wind out of the sails of unrest because he was forced out.

Perhaps - perhaps - the handwriting is starting to appear on the wall ?
150 posted on 02/17/2011 4:20:20 PM PST by PieterCasparzen (Huguenot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
This is really pissing off some of obama’s disciples isn't it?
151 posted on 02/17/2011 4:23:32 PM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Zman
"Sun Yat Sen got a COLB? Really? Is there any documentation of this?

Info about Sun Yat Sen: http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1999/990823/sun_yat_sen1.html

Sun Yat Sen was not born in Hawaii (or the territory of Hawaii).

The issuing of COLB's to foreign born people, based solely on the "affidavit" of 1 relative, is part of the HI corruption that's been going on for a very long time.

 

Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obama’s maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].).

152 posted on 02/17/2011 4:26:35 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: untrained skeptic
If Obama were found to be ineligible, it would shake our country to it's core. If everything he has signed as president were suddenly invalid all the budget bills would be invalid. How would you resolve all the laws being invalid and all the money that has already been spent?

If you think that if he is allowed to usurp the Presidency and take the country to hell, it is preferable to keep on with the illegitimate fraud? You're out of your mind. The country is already shaking to the core and ruination is happening right now.

153 posted on 02/17/2011 4:32:19 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

There are no “mind control techniques”. There’s just inter-human communication. Each sane person is wholly responsible for his or her own mind. The shooter was insane. His fascination with “mind control technique” could likely have arisen from a schizophrenic’s natural desire to gain back some control of his own mind.

We each influence those around us, each one of actions does so. But influence is not control. We control our cars, our video remotes, we even control animals with some effort and training. (Although mules and cats are difficult, even though they are considered domesticated.)

And sometimes we can have a great influence on others, and most often we are not even aware doing so. But influence is not control.


154 posted on 02/17/2011 4:35:12 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: bushpilot1

We have a clipping from a newspaper! Quick — let Bill O’Reilly know!


155 posted on 02/17/2011 4:37:20 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; COUNTrecount; rxsid; David; butterdezillion; Danae; Red Steel; All

I don’t understand. She’s clearly shown as Counsel of Record for Respondent for all the below referenced SCOTUS matters. She was, therefore, privy to facts from her client, BHO, was she not? And appears to have an obvious ethical conflict of interest, does she not?

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

************

No. 09-8857
Title: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

Docketed: January 29, 2010

Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit

Case Nos.: (09-5103)
Decision Date: October 28, 2009

~~~Date~~~ ~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~

Nov 18 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2010)

Feb 16 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.

Mar 11 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 26, 2010.

Mar 29 2010 Petition DENIED.

~~Name~~~~~~~ ~Address~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~

Attorneys for Petitioner:

Jerome Julius Brown Sr. 7209 Robin Hood Drive # 3093 (301) 357-9336
Upper Marlboro, MD 20773

Party name: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.

Attorneys for Respondents:

Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
Counsel of Record United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001

SupremeCtBriefs@USDOJ.gov

Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

*********

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm

http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm


156 posted on 02/17/2011 4:40:23 PM PST by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker
It seems to me that once the votes of the Electors are read out in the House of Representatives and the winner of the election is announced and after a President takes the oath there is really only one alternative under the Constitution to address the qualification issue. That would be by the House Judiciary Committee beginning an impeachment inquiry and issuing subpoenas for the relevant documents.

Unfortunately I'm afraid you are correct.

157 posted on 02/17/2011 4:42:59 PM PST by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

She was counsel of record for Obama in a number of cases, but none of them were eligibility cases. She is recused from any case she worked on when she was the Solicitor General, but is not recused from other cases involving Obama.


158 posted on 02/17/2011 4:45:25 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone

Except we know that one’s not real and the Hawaii one is. If you’re going to avoid reality, please stop wasting valuable time and bandwith that could better be filled with 10 year old pictures of Tourist Guy.


159 posted on 02/17/2011 4:45:44 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper ("Government does not solve problems; it subsidizes them." Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
This is just unbelievable. Certainly destroys the credibility of anyone who relies on the COLB as “evidence”
of citizenship.
160 posted on 02/17/2011 4:46:58 PM PST by Zman (Liberals: denying reality since Day One.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson