Posted on 02/17/2011 1:04:49 PM PST by rxsid
"Stunner! Supremes to give eligibility case another look
Challenge to Obama getting 2nd conference before court
In a stunning move, the U.S. Supreme Court has scheduled another "conference" on a legal challenge to Barack Obama's eligibility to occupy the Oval Office, but officials there are not answering questions about whether two justices given their jobs by Obama will participate.
The court has confirmed that it has distributed a petition for rehearing in the case brought by attorney John Hemenway on behalf of retired Col. Gregory Hollister and it will be the subject of a conference on March 4.
It was in January that the court denied, without comment, a request for a hearing on the arguments. But the attorney at the time had submitted a motion for Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, who were given their jobs by Obama, to recuse.
Should Obama ultimately be shown to have been ineligible for the office, his actions, including his appointments, at least would be open to challenge and question.
At the time, the Supreme Court acknowledged the "motion for recusal" but it changed it on official docketing pages to a "request." And it reportedly failed to respond to the motion.
..."
From: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=264897
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
Welcome back! We missed your postings. The struggle continues.
The Obots continue lusting for their golden calf aka presumed citizen obama.
I was trying to reply and couldn’t! Good you did.
Basically if the fraudulent “officer” was ignorant, and found out later, that’s one thing. But if the fraud was known about beforehand, then all is null and void.
It could easily completely crash our economy, and devolve our government into utter chaos.
If several states legislate strict methods of proving eligibility to get on the ballot, then Obama would either have to prove eligibility in the next election, or come up with a reason to not run again.
However, I see absolutely no chance that if he isn't eligible that we will ever see it proved.
Both Barry and Biden resign.
Boehner resigns as Speaker of the House and as a Representative.
Boehner acts as President. [i.e. Acting President]
No Presidential Oath is administered.
An Order of the United States Supreme Court could memorialize this as future legal precedent.
While that’s good news, I’m not going to hold my breath that they won’t continue to evade it and the US Constitution.
"Et al" is right. A rose stink weed by any other name would stink the same.
Why is Kagan named in those filings?
His legal father is still speculation because he's sealed his records so all we have is heresay from him and his ghost writer, Ayers.
Info about Sun Yat Sen: http://www.time.com/time/asia/asia/magazine/1999/990823/sun_yat_sen1.html
Sun Yat Sen was not born in Hawaii (or the territory of Hawaii).
The issuing of COLB's to foreign born people, based solely on the "affidavit" of 1 relative, is part of the HI corruption that's been going on for a very long time.
Hawaii's Territorial Law, Chapter 57 - "VITAL STATISTICS, I", shown beginning pg 23 of 29, (the law in effect in 1961) allowed the parents (or grandparents or other relative) of baby's born anywhere in the world to be eligible to apply for a Hawaiian birth certificate. A mailed-in form (without mention of a hospital, doctor, or midwife) signed by one of his grandparents (who forged the parent signature(s)) would have been enough to set up a birth record and a birth certificate at the Dept of Health. The Dept of Health would (presumably) then have automatically sent the names of the parents, their address as given on the mailed-in form , the gender of the child, and the date of birth to the Honolulu Advertiser and Star-Bulletin. The address given for the parents in the newspaper announcements is actually, however, the August 1961 home address of Obamas maternal grandparents Stanley and Madelyn Dunham [6085 Kalanianaole Highway], and not the 1961 home address of Barack Obama, Sr. [625 11th Ave].).
If you think that if he is allowed to usurp the Presidency and take the country to hell, it is preferable to keep on with the illegitimate fraud? You're out of your mind. The country is already shaking to the core and ruination is happening right now.
There are no “mind control techniques”. There’s just inter-human communication. Each sane person is wholly responsible for his or her own mind. The shooter was insane. His fascination with “mind control technique” could likely have arisen from a schizophrenic’s natural desire to gain back some control of his own mind.
We each influence those around us, each one of actions does so. But influence is not control. We control our cars, our video remotes, we even control animals with some effort and training. (Although mules and cats are difficult, even though they are considered domesticated.)
And sometimes we can have a great influence on others, and most often we are not even aware doing so. But influence is not control.
We have a clipping from a newspaper! Quick — let Bill O’Reilly know!
I don’t understand. She’s clearly shown as Counsel of Record for Respondent for all the below referenced SCOTUS matters. She was, therefore, privy to facts from her client, BHO, was she not? And appears to have an obvious ethical conflict of interest, does she not?
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
************
No. 09-8857
Title: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Petitioner
v.
Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
Docketed: January 29, 2010
Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Case Nos.: (09-5103)
Decision Date: October 28, 2009
~~~Date~~~ ~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~
Nov 18 2009 Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 1, 2010)
Feb 16 2010 Waiver of right of respondents Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al. to respond filed.
Mar 11 2010 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of March 26, 2010.
Mar 29 2010 Petition DENIED.
~~Name~~~~~~~ ~Address~~~~~~~~ ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Jerome Julius Brown Sr. 7209 Robin Hood Drive # 3093 (301) 357-9336
Upper Marlboro, MD 20773
Party name: Jerome Julius Brown, Sr.
Attorneys for Respondents:
Elena Kagan Solicitor General (202) 514-2217
Counsel of Record United States Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Party name: Barack H. Obama, President of the United States, et al.
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
*********
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-8857.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-724.htm
Unfortunately I'm afraid you are correct.
She was counsel of record for Obama in a number of cases, but none of them were eligibility cases. She is recused from any case she worked on when she was the Solicitor General, but is not recused from other cases involving Obama.
Except we know that one’s not real and the Hawaii one is. If you’re going to avoid reality, please stop wasting valuable time and bandwith that could better be filled with 10 year old pictures of Tourist Guy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.